Contents of research paper presentation

Related slideshares at tation of research amouli gunturi l, quality assurance hed on mar 9, should u present your research work..? You sure you want message goes r - ocean media you sure you want message goes sor at tribhuvan university, van university, you sure you want message goes riter at r+v t at dkm tation of research tation of research work
how to make an efficient presentation…? Bad news
writing a thesis is hard, painful work
you’ve already done the fun part (the research)
it’s unlike any other document
thesis writing is not a marketable skill
. Br />an argument
an exposition of an original piece of research
probably the largest (most self-indulgent) piece of work you’ll ever do
something that could be published:
e. At least one paper in a scholarly journal
but you will probably never publish the whole thesis
. Of contents
introduction
thesis message
background
context, definitions, notation
theoretical developments
empirical results
analysis
related work
conclusions
list contributions
. Of contents
background & related work overlap
need to discuss related work at start to set scene
need to discuss related work at end to demonstrate your originality
often one chapter per workshop or conference papers
but not cut and paste! Br />so, i’ve got a good thesis message
and a table of contents
what do i do next? T omit any of these
title (and title page) - conveys a message
abstract - for the librarian
contents listing - shows the right things are there
acknowledgements - get your supervisor on your side! Br />your examiners are busy people
examining theses is a chore, but:
“it might help me keep up to date with an area of research”
“i might learn something”
“i might gain a new colleague”
note: the reading will be done in trains, planes, and departmental meetings! Br />typical scanning order of a new thesis
abstract  bibliographie  conclusions  contents
this may be enough to decide whether it’s worth a phd.

How to make research paper presentation

Br />typical corrections
typographical / grammatical errors
poor presentation
missing statements / references
superfluous / redundant statements)
. Br />missing pieces of work
whole sections missing … for example:
research questions
critical review of literature
research methodology
presentation of results
validation of results
discussion and conclusions
. Powerpoint slides
avoiding the pitfalls of bad slides
make a good presentation
presentation of research work
. Br />make your 1st or 2nd slide an outline of your presentation
ex: previous slide
follow the order of your outline for the rest of the presentation
only place main points on the outline slide
ex: use the titles of each slide as main points
. Structure – good
use 1-2 slides per minute of your presentation
write in point form, not complete sentences
include 4-5 points per slide
avoid wordiness: use key words and phrases only
. Structure – good
show one point at a time:
will help audience concentrate on what you are saying
will prevent audience from reading ahead
will help you keep your presentation focused
. Good
use backgrounds such as this one that are attractive but simple
use backgrounds which are light
use the same background consistently throughout your presentation
. And grammar
proof your slides for:
speling mistakes
the use of of repeated words
grammatical errors you might have make
if english is not your first language, please have someone else check your presentation! Br />use an effective and strong closing
your audience is likely to remember your last words
use a conclusion slide to:
summarize the main points of your presentation
suggest future avenues of research
. Br />end your presentation with a simple question slide to:
invite your audience to ask questions
provide a visual aid during question period
avoid ending a presentation abruptly
. Study course - linkedin heavin the thinkable course - linkedin ve inspirations: duarte design, presentation design course - linkedin ch presentation ch project power t your research project in 10 simple ch paper power ch paper powerpoint presentation for public research sent successfully..

Clipboards featuring this public clipboards found for this the most important slides with ng is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your can see my sity of southern zing your social sciences research an oral zing your social sciences research paper: giving an oral purpose of this guide is to provide advice on how to develop and organize a research paper in the social of research flaws to ndent and dependent ry of research terms. Choosing a research ing a topic ning a topic ing the timeliness of a topic idea. An oral g with g someone else's to manage group of structured group project survival g a book le book review ing collected g a field informed g a policy g a research ing for your oral some classes, writing the research paper is only part of what is required. Here are some things to think about before you are scheduled to give your presentation. Your professor hasn't explicitly stated what your presentation should focus on, think about what you want to achieve and what you consider to be the most important things that members of the audience should know about your study. Think about the following: do i want to inform my audience, inspire them to think about my research, or convince them of a particular point of view? But professors often ask students to give an oral presentation to practice the art of communicating and to learn to speak clearly and audibly about yourself and your research. Also, having no notes increases the chance you'll lose your train of thought and begin relying on reading from the presentation slides. Only highlight the most important elements of your adequate space on your notes to jot down additional thoughts or observations before and during your presentation. This is also helpful when writing down your thoughts in response to a question or to remember a multi-part question [remember to have a pen with you when you give your presentation].

If appropriate, include a cue in your notes if there is a point during your presentation when you want the audience to refer to a out challenging words phonetically and practice saying them ahead of time. Your draft into key points to write on your presentation slides and/or note cards and/or e your visual se your presentation and practice getting the presentation completed within the time limit given by your professor. Clear examples to illustrate your points and/or key appropriate, consider using visual aids to make your presentation more interesting [e. Institut national de télécommunications, evry ring your delivering your presentation, keep in mind the following points. The better you know your presentation, the better you can control these verbal your voice quality. If you always use the same volume and pitch [for example, all loud, or all soft, or in a monotone] during your presentation, your audience will stop listening. These are also moments in your presentation to consider using body language, such as hand gestures or leaving the podium to point to a slide, to help emphasize key pauses. One hand in your pocket gives the impression of being relaxed, but both hands in pockets looks too casual and should be ct with the aware of how your audience is reacting to your presentation. If an audience member persists, kindly tell them that the issue can be addressed after you've completed the rest of your presentation and note to them that their issue may be addressed by things you say in the rest of your presentation [it may not be, but at least saying so allows you to move on]. Introduction should begin with something that grabs the attention of your audience, such as, an interesting statistic, a brief narrative or story, or a bold assertion, and then clearly tell the audience in a well-crafted sentence what you plan to accomplish in your presentation. If you read your presentation as if it were an essay, your audience will probably understand very little about you say and will lose concentration quickly.

Pmc3136027how to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentationchittaranjan andradedepartment of psychopharmacology, national institute of mental health and neurosciences, bangalore, karnataka, indiaaddress for correspondence: dr. Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly article has been cited by other articles in ctabstracts of scientific papers are sometimes poorly written, often lack important information, and occasionally convey a biased picture. This paper provides detailed suggestions, with examples, for writing the background, methods, results, and conclusions sections of a good abstract. The primary target of this paper is the young researcher; however, authors with all levels of experience may find useful ideas in the ds: abstract, preparing a manuscript, writing skillsintroductionthis paper is the third in a series on manuscript writing skills, published in the indian journal of psychiatry. Earlier articles offered suggestions on how to write a good case report,[1] and how to read, write, or review a paper on randomized controlled trials. 2,3] the present paper examines how authors may write a good abstract when preparing their manuscript for a scientific journal or conference presentation. Although the primary target of this paper is the young researcher, it is likely that authors with all levels of experience will find at least a few ideas that may be useful in their future abstract of a paper is the only part of the paper that is published in conference proceedings. The abstract is the only part of the paper that a potential referee sees when he is invited by an editor to review a manuscript. The abstract is the only part of the paper that readers see when they search through electronic databases such as pubmed. Finally, most readers will acknowledge, with a chuckle, that when they leaf through the hard copy of a journal, they look at only the titles of the contained papers. Only a dedicated reader will peruse the contents of the paper, and then, most often only the introduction and discussion sections.

Only a reader with a very specific interest in the subject of the paper, and a need to understand it thoroughly, will read the entire , for the vast majority of readers, the paper does not exist beyond its abstract. For the referees, and the few readers who wish to read beyond the abstract, the abstract sets the tone for the rest of the paper. It is therefore the duty of the author to ensure that the abstract is properly representative of the entire paper. In the rest of this paper, issues related to the contents of each section will be examined in oundthis section should be the shortest part of the abstract and should very briefly outline the following information:What is already known about the subject, related to the paper in questionwhat is not known about the subject and hence what the study intended to examine (or what the paper seeks to present). The purpose of the background, as the word itself indicates, is to provide the reader with a background to the study, and hence to smoothly lead into a description of the methods employed in the authors publish papers the abstracts of which contain a lengthy background section. In most cases, however, a longer background section means that less space remains for the presentation of the results. This is unfortunate because the reader is interested in the paper because of its findings, and not because of its background. Wide variety of acceptably composed backgrounds is provided in table 2; most of these have been adapted from actual papers. Readers have only to flip through the pages of a randomly selected journal to realize how common such carelessness 4 presents examples of the contents of accept-ably written methods sections, modified from actual publications. Already mentioned, the abstract is the only part of the paper that the vast majority of readers see. There were several other serious limitations that rendered the authors’ conclusions tentative, at best; yet, nowhere in the abstract were these other limitations a parting note: most journals provide clear instructions to authors on the formatting and contents of different parts of the manuscript.

It could also be an excellent idea to model the abstract of the paper, sentence for sentence, on the abstract of an important paper on a similar subject and with similar methodology, published in the same journal for which the manuscript is tessource of support: nil conflict of interest: none nces1. Placeboxetine for major depressive disorder: researcher, author, reader, and reviewer perspectives on randomized controlled trials. Pubmed]articles from indian journal of psychiatry are provided here courtesy of wolters kluwer -- medknow s:article | pubreader | epub (beta) | printer friendly | presentation scientific papers, oral presentations at a conference or internal seminar are for sharing your research work with other scientists. They, too, must convince the audience that the research presented is important, valid, and relevant to them. To this end, oral presentations — like papers — must emphasize both the motivation for the work and the outcome of it, and they must present just enough evidence to establish the validity of this outcome. Also like papers, they must aim to inform, not contrast, presentations differ from papers in at least three ways: they are more localized in space and time, they impose a sequence and rhythm to the audience, and they normally include some level of interaction. These three differences affect the selection of a presentation's they are recorded or broadcast, presentations have a more clearly defined audience than papers: they address "the people in the room," here and now. Papers can be forwarded in unpredictable ways and may be read many years from now, so they should be lasting and largely self-contained. For example, a presentation at a conference normally aims to present recent advances, whereas a presentation at a ph. Students (in other fields) of one student's line of structure your presentation, you can print the form shown here and write your ideas for each component in the spaces provided. All rights s papers can be read in any order and at the reader's own pace, presentations impose both the sequence and the rhythm of content on their audience.

The idea is not to say out loud everything that is already written in the proceedings paper or dissertation. Written documents are for convincing with detailed evidence; oral presentations, on the other hand, are for convincing with delivery — both verbal and y, presentations normally include interaction in the form of questions and answers. For fear of omitting something important, most speakers try to say too much in their presentations. A better approach is to be selective in the presentation itself and to allow enough time for questions and answers and, of course, to prepare well by anticipating the questions the audience might a consequence, and even more strongly than papers, presentations can usefully break the chronology typically used for reporting research. Instead of presenting everything that was done in the order in which it was done, a presentation should focus on getting a main message across in theorem-proof fashion — that is, by stating this message early and then presenting evidence to support it. Identifying this main message early in the preparation process is the key to being selective in your presentation. For example, when reporting on materials and methods, include only those details you think will help convince the audience of your main message — usually little, and sometimes nothing at three speakers (john, marie, and jean-luc) closed their presentations with a review, a conclusion, and a close. Because he divided his presentation's body in two fairly separated parts, john reviews and concludes each separately, thus merging review and conclusion. 2010 nature education all rights its intent and structure, the opening of an oral presentation is similar to the introduction of a scientific paper, which provides the context, need, task, and object of the document, with three main differences:The context as such is best replaced by an attention getter, which is a way to both get everyone's attention fast and link the topic with what the audience already knows (this link provides a more audience-specific form of context). Object of the document is here best called the preview because it outlines the body of the presentation. Still, the aim of this element is unchanged — namely, preparing the audience for the structure of the opening of a presentation can best state the presentation's main message, just before the preview.

It is your main conclusion, perhaps stated in slightly less technical detail than at the end of your other words, include the following five items in your opening: attention getter, need, task, main message, and structured her presentation around three main points and, for each, she included either two or three subpoints. Together, these main points and subpoints represent about as much detail as your audience can absorb in a single oral if you think of your presentation's body as a tree, you will still deliver the body as a sequence in time — unavoidably, one of your main points will come first, one will come second, and so on. As a rule, place your strongest arguments first and last, and place any weaker arguments between these stronger three speakers (john, marie, and jean-luc) closed their presentations with a review, a conclusion, and a close. Finally, close the presentation by tly and unambiguously to your audience that these are your last ng and ending first few sentences and last few sentences of an oral presentation are particularly important because they shape the first and last impressions you make on your audience. Thus, they deserve special the beginning of any presentation, you must get the attention of the audience — and you must do so quickly. As with a paper, you can spark their interest for your research by stating the need for your work, but you must first secure their full attention with an attention effective attention getter can take many forms: it can be a question, a statement, an anecdote (humorous or not), an analogy, a quotation, an object, a picture projected on the screen, and so on. As a counterexample, beginning a presentation by saying "my name is irma kodowski and i would like to talk to you today about . As a counterexample, starting your presentation with a joke unrelated to the topic will likely strike the audience as irrelevant. May the end of a presentation, you must indicate elegantly yet unambiguously to the audience that you have said your last words, thus giving them the signal to applaud. Thank you for your attention," is weak; make your audience thank you for delivering a great presentation instead. To make sure you start and end your presentation sharply, you might want to learn your first few and last few sentences by ing your presentation's able to give their full attention to content, audience members ure — in other words, they need a map of some sort (a table of contents,An object of the document, a preview), and they need to know at any time are on that map.

As a speaker, make sure you reveal your presentation'ure to the audience, with a preview,Transitions, and a w provides the audience with a map. As in a paper, it usefully comes end of the opening (not too early, that is) and outlines the body, not presentation. In addition, the preview should be limited to the of the presentation; subpoints can be previewed, if needed, at ing of each main crucial elements for revealing a presentation's structure, yet they underestimated. As a speaker, you obviously know when you are moving main point of a presentation to another — but for attendees, are never obvious. Inheritance and expression and c acid structure and somes and ionary tion and quantitative origins and ns and gene lular cycle and cell ific rds from the lating presentation scientific papers, oral presentations at a conference or internal seminar are for sharing your research work with other scientists.