Literature review of a project

Literature review is both a summary and explanation of the complete and current state of knowledge on a limited topic as found in academic books and journal articles. There are two kinds of literature reviews you might write at university: one that students are asked to write as a stand-alone assignment in a course, often as part of their training in the research processes in their ﬁeld, and the other that is written as part of an introduction to, or preparation for, a longer work, usually a thesis or research report. The focus and perspective of your review and the kind of hypothesis or thesis argument you make will be determined by what kind of review you are writing. One way to understand the differences between these two types is to read published literature reviews or the ﬁrst chapters of theses and dissertations in your own subject area. Analyse the structure of their arguments and note the way they address the e of the literature gives readers easy access to research on a particular topic by selecting high quality articles or studies that are relevant, meaningful, important and valid and summarizing them into one complete provides an excellent starting point for researchers beginning to do research in a new area by forcing them to summarize, evaluate, and compare original research in that speciﬁc ensures that researchers do not duplicate work that has already been can provide clues as to where future research is heading or recommend areas on which to highlights key ﬁ identiﬁes inconsistencies, gaps and contradictions in the provides a constructive analysis of the methodologies and approaches of other t of the introduction explains the focus and establishes the importance of the subject. In a stand-alone literature review, this statement will sum up and evaluate the state of the art in this ﬁeld of research; in a review that is an introduction or preparatory to a thesis or research report, it will suggest how the review ﬁndings will lead to the research the writer proposes to divided by headings/subheadings, the body summarizes and evaluates the current state of knowledge in the ﬁeld. If the review is preliminary to your own thesis or research project, its purpose is to make an argument that will justify your proposed research. If the review is an introduction to your own research, it highlights gaps and indicates how previous research leads to your own research project and chosen methodology. If the review is a stand-alone assignment for a course, it should suggest any practical applications of the research as well as the implications and possibilities for future steps to writing a literature review.

Literature review in a project

It is best to use at least two databases relevant to your er that the reference lists of recent articles and reviews can lead to valuable certain that you also include any studies contrary to your point of view. If your literature review is extensive, ﬁnd a large table surface, and on it place post-it notes or ﬁling cards to organize all your ﬁndings into categories. If, for example, you ﬁnd that each paragraph begins with a researcher's name, it might indicate that, instead of evaluating and comparing the research literature from an analytical point of view, you have simply described what research has been done. So if your paper still does not appear to be deﬁned by a central, guiding concept, or if it does not critically analyse the literature selected, then you should make a new outline based on what you have said in each section and paragraph of the paper, and decide whether you need to add information, to delete off-topic information, or to restructure the paper example, look at the following two passages and note that student a is merely describing the literature and student b takes a more analytical and evaluative approach, by comparing and contrasting. That way you will be better able to identify where you need punctuation marks to signal pauses or divisions within sentences, where you have made grammatical errors, or where your sentences are the purpose of a literature review is to demonstrate that the writer is familiar with the important professional literature on the chosen subject, check to make certain that you have covered all of the important, up-to-date, and pertinent texts. In the sciences and some of the social sciences it is important that your literature be quite recent; this is not so important in the certain that all of the citations and references are correct and that you are referencing in the appropriate style for your discipline. Should be written in a clear and concise academic style; it should not be descriptive in nature or use the language of everyday should be no grammatical or spelling ces should ﬂow smoothly and a paper in the sciences, or in some of the social sciences, the use of subheadings to organize the review is ibility information. Stone road eastguelph, ontario, n1g ture review: conducting & literature ture review: conducting & guide will provide research and writing tips to help students complete a literature review for conducting a lit g "the literature". Lit reviews from communication ture review sample ture review sample ture review sample an exemplary literature review?

You an instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post? Previous: wikipedia, the free to: navigation, a focused scientific review with pre-defined methodology, see systematic has been suggested that this article be merged into review article. Literature review is a text of a scholarly paper, which includes the current knowledge including substantive findings, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. Most often associated with academic-oriented literature, such reviews are found in academic journals, and are not to be confused with book reviews that may also appear in the same publication. 1][unreliable source] a narrow-scope literature review may be included as part of a peer-reviewed journal article presenting new research, serving to situate the current study within the body of the relevant literature and to provide context for the reader. In such a case, the review usually precedes the methodology and results sections of the ing a literature review may also be part of graduate and post-graduate student work, including in the preparation of a thesis, dissertation, or a journal article. Literature reviews are also common in a research proposal or prospectus (the document that is approved before a student formally begins a dissertation or thesis). Fourth type, the systematic review, is often classified separately, but is essentially a literature review focused on a research question, trying to identify, appraise, select and synthesize all high-quality research evidence and arguments relevant to that question. A meta-analysis is typically a systematic review using statistical methods to effectively combine the data used on all selected studies to produce a more reliable result.

And rangarajan (2013) distinguish between the process of reviewing the literature and a finished work or product known as a literature review. 5]:193–229 the process of reviewing the literature is often ongoing and informs many aspects of the empirical research project. Scholars need to be scanning the literature long after a formal literature review product appears to be completed. The process of reviewing the literature requires different kinds of activities and ways of thinking. 6] shields and rangarajan (2013) and granello (2001) link the activities of doing a literature review with benjamin bloom’s revised taxonomy of the cognitive domain (ways of thinking: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating). For a person doing a literature review this would include tasks such as recognition, retrieval and recollection of the relevant literature. Understanding may be challenging because the literature could introduce the scholar to new terminology, conceptual framework and methodology. In bloom’s third category applying the scholar is able to make connections between the literature and his or her larger research project. This is particularly true if the literature review is to be a chapter in a future empirical study.

Analysis of the literature allows the scholar to develop frameworks for analysis and the ability to see the big picture and know how details from the literature fit within the big picture. When scholars use bloom’s fifth category evaluating they are able to see the strengths and weaknesses of the theories, arguments, methodology and findings of the literature they have collected and read. 7] when scholars engage in creating the final category in bloom's taxonomy, they bring creativity to the process of doing a literature review. They may be able to find a fresh and original research question, identify a heretofore, unknown gap in the literature or make surprising connections. By understanding how ways of thinking connect to tasks of a literature review, a scholar is able to be self-reflective and bring metacognition to the process of reviewing the literature. The process of reviewing the literature and writing a literature review can be complicated and lengthy. Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: using bloom's taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Writing literature reviews: a guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (6th ed. Shuttleworth 564k this page on your website:Many students are instructed, as part of their research program, to perform a literature review, without always understanding what a literature review article is a part of the guide:Select from one of the other courses available:Experimental ty and ical tion and psychology e projects for ophy of sance & tics beginners tical bution in er 30 more articles on this 't miss these related articles:2quantitative and qualitative research.

Literature review can be a precursor in the introduction of a research paper, or it can be an entire paper in itself, often the first stage of large research projects, allowing the supervisor to ascertain that the student is on the correct path. A good literature review should also have some evaluation of the quality and findings of the research. Good literature review should avoid the temptation of impressing the importance of a particular research program. They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, it is best example, a review of victorian age physics, could present j. Otherwise, this is usually perceived as being a little lazy, and it is better to organize the review around ideas and individual a general rule, certainly for a longer review, each paragraph should address one point, and present and evaluate all of the evidence, from all of the differing points of ting a literature review evaluating the credibility of sources is one of the most difficult aspects, especially with the ease of finding information on the only real way to evaluate is through experience, but there are a few tricks for evaluating information quickly, yet is such a thing as ‘too much information,’ and google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is. Failure to do this will completely invalidate the literature review and potentially undermine the research project. Check into the credentials of any source upon which you rely heavily for the literature review. It may be a little extra work for them, but there will be even more work if they have to tear apart a review because it is built upon shaky ting a good literature review is a matter of experience, and even the best scientists have fallen into the trap of using poor evidence. Take it with you wherever you research council of ibe to our rss blakstad on to write an introduction - introducing the research ch designs - how to construct an experiment or atic reviews - evaluating previous g an abstract - how to write a ch paper outline ign upprivacy policy.