Writing a research protocol

And ch policy ended format for a research the abstract of a research paper, the project summary, should be no more than 300 words and at the most a page long (font size 12, single spacing). Provided preferably on a separate page, it should summarize all the central elements of the protocol, for example the rationale, objectives, methods, populations, time frame, and expected outcomes. It should stand on its own, and not refer the reader to points in the project ol title, protocol identifying number (if any), and and address of the sponsor/ and title of the investigator(s) who is (are) responsible for conducting the research, and the address and telephone number(s) of the research site(s), including responsibilities of (s) and address(es) of the clinical laboratory(ies) and other medical and/or technical department(s) and/or institutions involved in the ale & background rationale specifies the reasons for conducting the research in light of current knowledge. It is the equivalent to the introduction in a research paper and it puts the proposal in context. It should answer the question of why and what: why the research needs to be done and what will be its relevance. They create a setting for the ic objectives are statements of the research question(s).

What is a research protocol

Objectives should be simple (not complex), specific (not vague), and stated in advance (not after the research is done). The design of the study should include information on the type of study, the research population or the sampling frame, and who can take part (e. For example, a study may be described as being a basic science research, epidemiologic or social science research, it may also be described as observational or interventional; if observational, it may be either descriptive or analytic, if analytic it could either be cross-sectional or longitudinal etc. The link below provides more information on how to describe a research methodology section is the most important part of the protocol. If multiple sites are engaged in a specified protocol, methodology should be standardized and clearly entions should be described in detail, including a description of the drug/device/vaccine that is being tested. Interventions could also be in the realm of social sciences for example providing training or information to groups of ures could be biomedical (collection of blood or sputum samples to develop a diagnostic test), or in the realm of social sciences (doing a questionnaire survey, carrying out a focus group discussion as part of formative research, observation of the participant's environment, etc.

Aresearch protocol

Safety aspects of the research should always be kept in mind and information provided in the protocol on how the safety of research participants will be ensured. It is useful to remember that even administering a research questionnaire can have adverse effects on research protocol must give a clear indication of what follow up will be provided to the research participants and for how long. This may include a follow u, especially for adverse events, even after data collection for the research study is management and statistical protocol should provide information on how the data will be managed, including data handling and coding for computer analysis, monitoring and verification. For projects involving qualitative approaches, specify in sufficient detail how the data will be protocol should describe the quality control and quality assurance system for the conduct of the study, including gcp, follow up by clinical monitors, dsmb, data management ed outcomes of the protocol should indicate how the study will contribute to advancement of knowledge, how the results will be utilized, not only in publications but also how they will likely affect health care, health systems, or health ination of results and publication protocol should specify not only dissemination of results in the scientific media, but also to the community and/ or the participants, and consider dissemination to the policy makers where relevant. Publication policy should be clearly discussed- for example who will take the lead in publication and who will be acknowledged in publications, on of the protocol should specify the time that each phase of the project is likely to take, along with a detailed month by month timeline for each activity to be section should discuss the difficulties that the investigators anticipate in successfully completing their projects within the time frame stipulated and the funding requested. It should also offer possible solutions to deal with these section should describe the role and responsibility of each member of the protocol should have a description of ethical considerations relating to the study.

It should also describe how the investigator(s) plan to obtain informed consent from the research participants (the informed consent process). Consent approved version of the protocol must have copies of informed consent forms (icf), both in english and the local language in which they are going to be administered. If the research involves more than one group of individuals, for example healthcare users and healthcare providers, a separate specifically tailored informed consent form must be included for each group. 11); 2016 s:article | pubreader | epub (beta) | pdf (84k) | to write a research to write a research to write a research will need to write a research protocol to accompany your ethics application - whether you submit to lancaster university's faculty or university ethics committee or though the nhs iras system. You may also find the production of a protocol useful if you want to include other staff in your project - for example, as referrers of participants or as interested ward staff - and need to provide a coherent summary of the project. Essentially the protocol serves as an introduction to the project content area and as an explicit guide on all aspects of your proposed methodology.

A good protocol will help you in the production of your final report - partly because you may be able to use and expand on some sections (changing all the tenses, naturally) but mainly because so much of the thinking and planning of the project will have already been well thought through. A good protocol is evidence that you have clarified your research project to the point that when it comes to data collection and analysis, you are confident about the analysis you are going to do and the implications of this analysis on your research i can feel that you are now all convinced of the need for well-written protocols, i will move on to how to create one. Reasonable structure for a protocol would be as follows:Name of applicant/supervisors/affiliations/version als (if relevant). The title should sum up the of the introduction to the protocol as similar to the introduction to a lab report (remember them? At the end of the first part of the introduction, your readers need to be convinced that your research project: 1) is necessary - and that it is timely; 2) that it should be done in the way that you propose to do it. You should aim to finish this section with a statement which is a logical summary of the state of play research-wise at the moment and which makes a solid case for your research project to be carried out.

Clearly the need to investigate comprehensively control and attributional style remains an important research objective. If your work is qualitative then again, one research question will probably be will need to be explicit about your inclusion and exclusion criteria. Especially for quantitative research, it needs to be as representative as possible with as little possibility for a biased selection procedure. However, make sure that you write these in a way which is consistent with the ethos and methodology of qualitative research. Instead, be more mindful of the need to create audit trails evidencing from where your themes, for example, have emerged, to provide a thoughtful analysis and reflexive analysis and to show how you will attempt to engage your participants in the most of you, in quantitative research, your materials will be the questionnaires you administer or, in qualitative research, the interview schedule. As well as giving these details, you would also need to append the actual questionnaires at the end of your protocol.

For qualitative research) then please remember that a list of topic areas is fine and you do not have to specific every single question you will ask. Also, please note that a study's 'research question' is different from the questions you indicate in the interview need to provide a very detailed account of exactly how participants are going to be referred into your study, what happens to them during the study (i. In qualitative research, there could well be some checking of the conclusions with participants so you will also need to include this. Particularly in qualitative research you need to be explicit about how you are going to record/transcribe the interview and how you will store the sly you can't include in the protocol your actual results - unless you have powers you have omitted to mention at interview. Qualitative research, it is important to specify the data analytic techniques which will be used. In grounded theory research, for example, the data analytic strategy include open coding, axial coding and the production of a conditional matrix.

Think logistically about the practicalities of your research and indicate that you have thought things e a realistic assessment of the ethical considerations of your project. Work at this stage can mean one less thing to do when you are approaching the submission aim of your protocol is to provide a comprehensive guide to your project so interested parties understand all the relevant details. You need to have the following objectives in your mind when you write it:Will the reader be convinced there is a real need to do this research? The reader be convinced that i have thought about all the practical aspects of the the reader think this is an ethical project and that if there are slight risks (which, let's face it, are inherent in most research) that these are outweighed by the potential longer term benefits? Robson (2002) suggests regarding the reader of your protocol as a cross between an intelligent layperson and a generalist in the discipline and this seems about right in terms of the tone of your , n.